udavatz Zusammenfassung

Patient Care Philosophy

The patient care philosophy discussed in the sources emphasizes a community-oriented, holistic, and prevention-focused approach, fundamentally opposing the increasing economization of healthcare.

Key tenets of this philosophy include:

  • Focus on the Neglected and Vulnerable: Dr. Saameli was initially drawn to social psychiatry because of the opportunity to build and expand services for patients who were often „neglected,“ specifically chronically psychotic, substance addicts, and those who are chronically ill. His aim was to work „bottom-up“ to serve the „poorest of the poor and neglected“. This highlights a core philosophy of prioritizing the most challenging and marginalized patient populations.
  • Decentralized and Community-Based Care: A central tenet is that psychiatric care should be decentralized and brought closer to where people live and work, integrating the social environment into treatment. This involved establishing outpatient services (Ambulatorien) and day clinics in various locations across the canton, a vision Dr. Saameli passionately advocated for and a reason he left Königsfelden when it was not initially implemented. The aim is to make care accessible in the patient’s immediate surroundings.
  • Prevention of Hospitalization and Early Intervention: A crucial aspect of this philosophy is to prevent unnecessary psychiatric hospitalizations. This is best achieved through integrated psychiatric emergency services within general hospitals, where psychiatric professionals can quickly intervene at the emergency department. This allows for early clarification and utilization of existing resources to avoid inpatient admission. The goal is to catch patients at an outpatient level rather than sending them to a clinic. There is a strong belief that significant financial savings could be made through earlier intervention in acute cases.
  • Vocational and Social Reintegration: The philosophy strongly advocates for active professional integration (berufliche Eingliederung) and rehabilitation. This includes training long-term patients for office work and computer skills to facilitate their entry into the job market, moving beyond traditional workshop employment to integration into the „service industry“ and the „free economy“. The hospital itself should serve as a model for this, creating training positions and even employing former patients in administration.
  • Systemic Thinking and Workplace Intervention: Patient care should adopt a systemic approach, meaning that the interaction between the patient and their social environment, including the workplace, must be considered, rather than treating the patient in isolation with only medication or individual techniques. For conditions like burnout, early interventions at the workplace to address conflicts and stress are seen as far more effective than prolonged sick leaves or hospitalizations in specialized clinics. The philosophy emphasizes avoiding „too long sick leaves and too early invalidization“ by supporting reintegration and part-time positions.
  • Prioritizing Need Over Profit: A fundamental critique against current trends is the economization of medicine, which has led to institutions needing patients to be profitable, rather than patients solely needing the institution for help and protection. The philosophy vehemently rejects the idea that care should be expanded or focused on generating revenue. Instead, it asserts that resources must be directed towards the „severely ill and disturbed individuals and family systems“ who are most in need, focusing on what is „necessary“ rather than what is „commercially profitable“. The shift to referring to patients as „customers“ is criticized as revealing a „seller“ mentality.
  • Maintaining Connection to Medicine and Broader Perspectives: While acknowledging the value of psychotherapy, Dr. Saameli stresses the importance of psychiatry retaining its connection to medicine and the understanding of disease processes. He also suggests that effective psychiatrists benefit from a „wide horizon“ derived from broader interests beyond medicine, such as literature and humanities, which enables them to „endure and effect change“.
  • Addressing the „Salonfähige Depression“ (Socially Acceptable Depression) of Burnout: While recognizing that burnout reduces the stigma associated with psychological illness, the philosophy cautions against it becoming an „honorable retreat option“. Despite the reduced stigma and the emergence of „luxury clinics“ for burnout, it is crucial to remember that individuals suffering from burnout are „suffering people,“ not merely „consumers,“ and require genuine and effective intervention.

https://adhs.expert/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/davatz_saameli.m4a_29.5.2025.pdf

udavatz Zusammenfassung

Healthcare System Challenges

The sources highlight several significant challenges within the healthcare system, particularly concerning the development and current state of social psychiatry in Switzerland. These challenges range from political and institutional resistance to fundamental issues of healthcare economization and shifting societal perceptions of mental illness.

Here are the key healthcare system challenges discussed:

  • Resistance to Social Psychiatry and Decentralization:
    • Political Opposition: Social psychiatry faced political backlash, with the Vice Director of the Königsfelden clinic derisively labeling it „SPD“ (Social Democratic Party of Germany) to associate it with radical political views. There was also resistance due to its association with „antipsychiatry“. The then-Health Director, Rainer Huber, initially insisted that all care remain centralized in Königsfelden due citing its „traditional and cultural importance,“ opposing the decentralization of services.
    • Internal Clinic Resistance: Within the Königsfelden clinic, the success and attractiveness of the social psychiatry department led to envy and jealousy from other colleagues and long-standing nursing staff, who felt the social psychiatry team was working „against the clinic“.
    • Opposition from Private Practitioners: Free-practicing doctors, particularly in Aargau and later in Thun, viewed the state-provided ambulatory psychiatric services as competition. A private psychiatrist in Thun, Alfred Stucki, was a vehement opponent, denouncing the new services as „state medicine“.
    • Fear of Increased Patient Numbers: A concern existed that expanding decentralized psychiatric services would lead to an increase in the number of patients being identified and treated, potentially overwhelming the system.
    • Integration Challenges in General Hospitals: When psychiatric services were introduced in general hospitals (e.g., Thun), hospitals were initially reluctant due to lack of space and general resistance, requiring new construction. Resistance also came from other departments, such as internists who felt they had exclusive claim to psychosomatic care. Overcoming this often required financial pressure from higher authorities.
  • Economization of Healthcare:
    • Profit-Driven Care: A major critique is the economization of psychiatry and medicine in general. Hospitals tend to prioritize inpatient treatment because it generates more revenue than outpatient care due to current health insurance tariffs. This leads to a situation where the institution now needs patients to be profitable, rather than patients solely needing the institution for help and protection.
    • Market Principles Increasing Costs: Dr. Saameli argues that the introduction of market principles into healthcare has increased costs, rather than reducing them through competition. He contends that competition often leads to „market expansion“ and the provision of more services because „the market wants to grow“.
    • Patient as „Customer“: The shift to referring to patients as „customers“ is criticized as revealing a „seller“ mentality.
    • Misdirection of Resources: There’s a concern that resources are directed where the most money can be made, rather than to the „severely ill and disturbed individuals and family systems“ who are most in need. The focus should be on what is necessary, not what is „commercially profitable“.
  • Staffing and Professional Standing:
    • Low Standing of Psychiatry: Psychiatry has historically had a lower standing within medicine compared to technical disciplines, which translates to lower financial compensation. This can contribute to a lack of Swiss psychiatrists, necessitating recruitment from abroad.
    • Burnout Among Staff: Healthcare professionals, including psychiatrists, are increasingly reluctant to work long hours or perform frequent emergency duties (Pikettdienst).
  • Burnout as a Societal and Medical Challenge:
    • „Huge Business“: Burnout has become a „huge business“ with specialized clinics emerging to treat it.
    • „Socially Acceptable Depression“: Burnout is often described as the „only psychological illness that one likes“ or a „salonfähige Depression“ (socially acceptable depression) because it carries less social stigma, allowing individuals to retreat from work without a perceived „blemish“. This normalization, while reducing stigma, can make it an „honorable retreat option“.
    • Ineffective Interventions: The current approach to burnout often involves prolonged sick leaves or hospitalizations in specialized clinics, rather than early intervention at the workplace to address conflicts and stress within the system.
    • Risk of Early Invalidization: There’s a risk of too long sick leaves and too early invalidization instead of efforts towards reintegration and support for part-time positions.
  • Systemic Approach and Prevention:
    • Centralization of Power: Despite the establishment of decentralized ambulatory services, the leadership and power often remain centralized within the main clinic, indicating a „step backward“ from truly community-focused social psychiatry.
    • Need for Integrated Emergency Services: There is a strong advocacy for psychiatric emergency services to be integrated with somatic (general) hospitals. This approach, proven in Thun, can prevent unnecessary psychiatric hospitalizations by allowing early intervention and assessment at the general hospital’s emergency department.
    • Focus on Prevention and Early Detection: Psychiatry needs to invest much more in prevention and early detection to avoid unnecessary hospitalizations and prevent social exclusion.
    • Addressing Systemic Issues: There is a need for a more systemic approach that examines the interaction between the patient and their social environment, including the workplace, rather than just treating the isolated individual.

https://adhs.expert/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/davatz_saameli.m4a_29.5.2025.pdf

udavatz Zusammenfassung

Social Psychiatry History

The history of social psychiatry discussed in the sources primarily revolves around the experiences and insights of Dr. Werner Saameli and Dr. Ursula Davatz in Switzerland, particularly in the Cantons of Aargau and Bern.

Early Development and Dr. Werner Saameli’s Beginnings

  • Appointment and Vision (1975-1976): Dr. Werner Saameli was chosen by Prof. Dr. med. F. Gnirss in 1975 and began his work in the Canton of Aargau in 1976. Gnirss intended for Saameli to advance social psychiatry. Saameli was particularly interested in the opportunity to build and expand services for patients who were often neglected, such as those with chronic psychoses, addiction, and other chronic illnesses. He aimed to work from a „bottom-up“ approach rather than „top-down,“ focusing on the „poorest of the poor and neglected“.
  • Preparation and Influences: Saameli felt well-prepared for this task. He had prior experience working with chronically ill patients during his practicum in Rheinau, where he also attempted a scientific paper. Before his position in Aargau, he worked with adolescents and alcoholics in Winterthur.
  • Concept of „Sozialpsychiatrie“: The term „Sozialpsychiatrie“ (social psychiatry) as a planning concept was already present in the directives for hospital and health planning in Aargau in 1971. A predecessor, Mr. Dubach, had also used this term.
  • Key Inspirations:
    • University Hospital Burghölzli, Zurich: Saameli learned and „copied“ a great deal from Professor Ambros Uchtenhagen’s social psychiatric service at the University Hospital Burghölzli in Zurich, which was experiencing a significant „spirit of new beginnings“ (Aufbruchsstimmung) post-1968.
    • Professor Raymond Battegay, Basel: Battegay also wrote books on social psychiatry.
    • Therapeutic Community: Saameli was deeply influenced by the principle of the therapeutic community, having read about it as early as 1965-1966. He was inspired by Maxwell Jones, a pioneer in this field from Scotland, who visited Königsfelden twice. Jones’s „milieu therapy“ was central to his approach. This approach allowed them to effectively implement principles of social learning and therapeutic community in the night clinic.
  • Dr. Ursula Davatz’s Contribution: Dr. Ursula Davatz joined Saameli on April 1, 1980. Saameli expected her to continue their positive working relationship from their time as assistants in Lausanne and to bring her experience with therapeutic communities and her knowledge of family therapy, which she had learned and practiced in the USA under Murray Bowen. Davatz also highlighted that family therapy fit very well into the concept of social psychiatry and felt it brought a theoretical component from America. Her local origin from Aargau was seen as an additional advantage by Saameli, who valued the integration of language and cultural background when working with mentally ill patients.

Challenges and Resistance to Social Psychiatry

Social psychiatry faced significant resistance, both politically and within the medical and psychiatric communities:

  • Political Opposition in Aargau:
    • The Vice Director of the Königsfelden clinic derisively referred to the social psychiatric service as „SPD“ (Social Democratic Party of Germany), attempting to label it as politically radical and link it to the „red corner“.
    • The association of social psychiatry with the „antipsychiatry“ label, stemming from progressive students who had studied in Berlin, also created resistance.
    • The then-Health Director, Rainer Huber, initially opposed the decentralization of services, insisting that all care should remain in Königsfelden due to its traditional and cultural importance. He preferred a „treatment chain“ concept for drug addicts.
  • Internal Clinic Resistance:
    • The success and attractiveness of the social psychiatry department in Königsfelden led to envy and jealousy from other colleagues and long-standing nursing staff within the clinic, who felt the social psychiatry team was working against the main clinic.
  • Opposition from Private Practitioners: Free-practicing doctors, particularly in Aargau, viewed the state-provided ambulatory psychiatric services as competition.
  • Fear of Increased Patient Numbers: There was a concern that expanding decentralized psychiatric services would lead to an increase in the number of patients being identified and treated, potentially overwhelming the system.

Expansion to Thun and Overcoming Obstacles

When Dr. Saameli moved to Thun, similar and new challenges arose:

  • Professional Support: In Thun, Saameli was strongly supported professionally by Professors Luc Ciompi and Edgar Heim in Bern, who advocated for decentralized psychiatric institutions integrated into general hospitals, moving beyond solely inpatient care.
  • „Eclatant“ Opposition in Bern: The Bernese Medical Association and its president vehemently opposed the establishment of these decentralized „support points,“ even publishing their stance in a newspaper.
  • Private Psychiatrist Opposition (Alfred Stucki): A private psychiatrist in Thun, Alfred Stucki, was a strong opponent, denouncing the new services as „state medicine“. However, he later became a good colleague, acknowledging the quality of Saameli’s work.
  • Hospital Internal Resistance: The Thun hospital itself was initially reluctant to integrate psychiatric services due to lack of space and general resistance, requiring a new building. This resistance was overcome through financial pressure from Heinz Locher of the Health Directorate, who threatened to cut funding for the new hospital building if the psychiatric service was not implemented as mandated by the Grand Council.
  • Inter-Departmental Conflicts: The internist department had difficulties, as they felt they had exclusive claim to psychosomatic care.
  • Gaining Acceptance: The psychiatric service eventually gained acceptance by handling difficult and unpleasant patients (e.g., psychopaths, alcoholics, stranded foreigners) and providing regular emergency services at the general hospital. This significantly lightened the load for other departments and earned them support from nursing staff.

Innovations and Successes in Vocational Integration

  • Berufsförderungskurs (Vocational Training Course): Saameli implemented a vocational training course in Thun, a concept he adapted from Ambros Uchtenhagen. This course trained long-term patients in office work and computer skills, preparing them for the open labor market, rather than just traditional workshops. This initiative also helped train hospital staff. Patients who successfully completed the course were even hired in hospital administration, demonstrating that psychiatry could effectively integrate long-term patients into the workforce and changing perceptions of psychiatric care.
  • „Möbelpfisterprojekt“: Saameli also launched the „Möbelpfisterprojekt,“ a vocational integration program that facilitated patients‘ entry directly into the free economy, not just state-supported workshops. This was considered a pioneering effort, supported by social worker Edi Simost. This emphasized a shift from simply employing disabled individuals in workshops to bringing them into the service industry.

Current State and Critiques of Modern Psychiatry

At the 30-year anniversary of outpatient psychiatry in Aargau, Saameli observed several developments:

  • Increased Complexity and Staff: The system has become significantly more complex and dense, with much more staff (around 120 people compared to 12 when he started) and more parallel parts of the Königsfelden clinic.
  • Decentralized Ambulatory Services: His earlier wish for decentralized ambulatories and day clinics in various locations (Aarau, Baden, Wohlen, Rheinfelden) has been realized.
  • Concerns about Centralization of Power: Despite the decentralized services, the head of the ambulatory services is still based in Königsfelden and reports to Professor Marc Walter, the overall head of adult psychiatry. Saameli views this as a „step backward“ because it signifies that power and leadership remain centralized within the institution, rather than being focused on the social environment where patients live and work. He believes that social psychiatry should be practiced with the social environment as the primary focus, not from the institution.
  • Economization of Healthcare: Saameli expresses strong criticism about the economization of psychiatry and medicine in general.
    • He notes that hospitals tend to prioritize inpatient treatment because it generates more revenue than outpatient care, driven by current health insurance tariffs. He advocates for changes in tariffs or a shift in concept to prioritize the role of the environment in treatment.
    • He argues that the introduction of market principles into healthcare has increased costs, rather than reducing them through competition, as competition often leads to market expansion and more services. He states that the relationship has inverted: the institution now needs patients to be profitable, whereas previously, patients needed the institution for help and protection.
    • He also states that those who refer to patients as „customers“ are revealing themselves as „sellers“.
  • Crisis Intervention: He advocates for psychiatric emergency services to be integrated with somatic (general) hospitals. This approach, proven in Thun, can prevent unnecessary psychiatric hospitalizations by allowing psychiatric professionals to intervene early at the general hospital’s emergency department.
  • Burnout and Stigma:
    • Saameli observes that burnout has become a „huge business“ with specialized clinics, and it is almost the „only psychological illness that one likes“ due to its socially acceptable nature. He labels it a „salonfähige Depression“ (socially acceptable depression).
    • He argues for early intervention at the workplace in cases of conflict or stress, rather than prolonged sick leaves or hospitalizations, as this would be a more sensible approach to managing burnout.
    • While the stigma of mental illness has decreased, leading to less shame in seeking help, there is a potential risk that it becomes an „honorable retreat option“ from work.
  • Future Direction: Saameli believes psychiatry must maintain its connection to medicine and focus on prevention and early detection to avoid unnecessary hospitalizations. The goal should be to invest in preventing exclusion from society. He emphasizes the need to treat severely ill and disturbed individuals and family systems, focusing on what is necessary rather than what is commercially profitable. Resources should be directed where they are most needed, not where the most money can be made. He concludes that good psychiatrists have interests beyond just medicine, which enables them to sustain and make an impact in their challenging profession.

https://adhs.expert/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/davatz_saameli.m4a_29.5.2025.pdf

udavatz Zusammenfassung

Therapeutic approaches for ADHD, ADD

Dr. Ursula Davatz advocates for a unique and comprehensive approach to supporting individuals with neurodiversity, particularly ADHS/ADS, emphasizing a shift from a traditional medical model of „disease“ to a neurodiversity perspective. She asserts that conditions like ADHS/ADS and Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASS), including hypersensitivity, are not fixed diseases but rather functional diagnoses of the brain that can change over time.

Here’s a breakdown of the therapeutic approaches discussed:

1. Coaching the Environment, Not the Child/Individual: The cornerstone of Dr. Davatz’s approach is to coach the adults in the child’s environment, such as parents and teachers, rather than directly treating the child or teenager.

  • Rationale: Adults are most consistently present in the child’s life, and it’s often the environment that needs correction, not the neurodivergent individual. This approach aims to prevent psychiatric and somatic illnesses that can arise from overly restrictive upbringing.
  • Key Strategies for Adults:
    • Clear and Personal Boundaries: Teachers and parents must have a clear stance and communicate rules based on their own conviction („I want it this way in my classroom“) rather than using „you must“ commands. These rules should be „gold-backed“ with their emotional attitude.
    • Patience and Delayed Compliance: Recognize that ADHS/ADS children often comply with a delay; rushing them („immediately!“) is ineffective.
    • Managing „High Arousal“ States: When a child is over-excited or overwhelmed (System Overload/Overflow), reasoning is futile. The priority is to let them cool down before discussing the situation. Adults must remain calmer than the child, expressing their own strong emotions „into the air“ rather than at the child.
    • Validation of Emotions: After a child has calmed down, it’s crucial to ask what upset them, what they felt was wrong, and validate their emotions („Okay, I understand“) before discussing alternative actions for the future. This focuses on understanding the underlying reason for behavior rather than immediate correction.
    • No Punishment or External Rewards: Dr. Davatz states that punishment does not work for ADHS/ADS children. Similarly, she discourages external rewards like money for good grades or „smilies,“ emphasizing that the true reward lies in a good relationship with the child and the inherent joy of learning.
    • Reinterpreting Behaviors: Behaviors like „teasing“ or „clowning“ should be reinterpreted not as malicious acts but as social exploration or approach behaviors, often used by ADHS/ADS individuals when uncertain about a situation.
    • Fostering Intrinsic Motivation: It’s vital for neurodivergent individuals to find their intrinsic motivation and „own focus“. Parents should not remove activities a child enjoys (e.g., football) as punishment for school performance, as this demotivates them further.
    • Supportive Educational Environment: The school should provide a protected environment where the child feels safe and can develop self-confidence and self-assurance. Public shaming for academic struggles or disruptive behavior is strongly condemned as it harms self-esteem and personality development. Instead, social learning and cooperation are prioritized over mere intelligence.
    • Personalized Rules and Problem-Solving: Rules should be stated clearly at the outset for the whole class, but also enforced personally. When problems arise between children, the focus should be on solving the problem together, involving the ADHS/ADS child in the solution, as they are often empathetic and helpful.

2. Specific Interventions for Learning Difficulties: For academic challenges like dyslexia or dyscalculia (which often co-occur with ADHS/ADS):

  • Individualized Support: Dr. Davatz advocates for one-on-one accompaniment and suggests utilizing learning therapists or tutors. She emphasizes that in subjects like mathematics, missing even one step can lead to a complete disconnect, making individual guidance essential.
  • Motivational Approach: Encourage children by highlighting the „double pride“ gained from mastering something they found difficult.
  • Adapting Teaching Methods: For languages like French, which are rich in rules, ADHS/ADS children might struggle. It’s suggested they learn through melody and speaking to engage their strengths.

3. Addressing Avoidance and Absenteeism: When a child avoids school or is frequently absent:

  • Investigate the Root Cause: Go home and try to understand why the child is avoiding school. Is it a social issue, academic difficulty, or fear of disappointing the teacher?.
  • Paradoxical Prescription: For severe resistance, especially with teenagers, a „paradoxical prescription“ from systemic therapy can be considered: instead of forcing attendance, tell the child to stay home and provide tasks, allowing them to return to school when they are ready, fostering intrinsic motivation.
  • Maintaining Connection: Even if the child stays home, maintain contact and require them to complete and submit assignments, perhaps even from a public place like a library or café.

4. Stance on Medication (Methylphenidate): While Dr. Davatz is a physician and prescribes medication, her approach is cautious:

  • Not a First Resort: She does not prescribe Methylphenidate (a stimulant) as the primary or first solution.
  • Mechanism: She explains that stimulants increase stress in the brain, which helps with focus.
  • Potential Downsides: She notes that early use of Ritalin can suppress creative abilities. Concentrating with ADHS/ADS requires more energy than for a „normotype“.
  • Weighing Benefits: While it may improve grades, she emphasizes that social and creative learning are also crucial. The decision to medicate rests with the parents. Medication might offer relief from social stress in some cases.

5. Family Therapy and Intergenerational Patterns: Dr. Davatz, as a family therapist, stresses the importance of understanding family dynamics, especially for individuals with Borderline personality disorder (which she sees as stemming from ADHS/ADS women raised too restrictively).

  • Exploring Family History: She asks about the parents‘ and even grandparents‘ upbringing, their school experiences, and their own parents‘ methods and values. This helps understand current interaction patterns and provide support.
  • Breaking Cycles: Understanding how one was raised is key to breaking intergenerational patterns in parenting.
  • Empowering Parents: The goal is to support the parents, not confront them about their „wrong“ behaviors.

6. Rejecting „Pathologizing“ Labels: Dr. Davatz actively challenges the medical system’s tendency to create numerous diagnoses or label neurodivergent conditions as „diseases“ or „disabilities“.

  • „Neurodiversity“ over „Disability“: She strongly prefers the term „neurodiversity,“ viewing these traits as different ways of functioning with both „handicaps“ and „pluses“ (e.g., creativity, enhanced perception).
  • Against Excessive Diagnostics: She finds extensive diagnostic clarification unnecessary and costly, as „it always comes back to the same brain“.
  • Challenging PDA (Pathological Demand Avoidance): She rejects working by the PDA principle, stating it would foster pathology. Instead, one should use their „healthy sensitivity“ and build a relationship with the child.

In essence, Dr. Davatz’s therapeutic approach is profoundly humanistic and systemic, prioritizing understanding, strong relationships, intrinsic motivation, and adapting the environment to suit the neurodivergent individual rather than forcing the individual to conform to an unsuitable environment.

https://adhs.expert/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/ADHS-Schule-fuer-Maedchen-28.5.2025.m4a.pdf

udavatz Zusammenfassung

ADHD/ADD Neurodiversity Perspective

Dr. Ursula Davatz advocates for a neurodiversity perspective when discussing conditions like ADHS/ADS, Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASS), and hypersensitivity. She emphasizes that these are not fixed diseases but rather functional diagnoses of the brain, which can change over time.

Here’s a deeper look into the neurodiversity perspective based on the sources:

  • ADHS/ADS as a Neurotype, Not a Disease: Dr. Davatz explicitly states that ADHS/ADS is „no disease“ but rather a „vulnerable, sensible neurotype“. She categorizes ASS (Autism Spectrum Disorder) and hypersensitivity under ADHS, viewing them as different facets of the same underlying neurotype rather than creating new, separate illnesses. She highlights that the brain functions holistically and is interconnected with the body, directing its organs. Every brain functions differently; there is no „normotype“.
  • Vulnerability and Sensitivity to Stress: A key aspect of this neurotype is a stronger, more reactive, and sensitive emotional brain (limbic system). This means individuals with ADHS/ADS are more susceptible to stress and require more energy for concentration. When exposed to stress, their emotional brain experiences a larger and longer-lasting „wave“ of excitement, potentially leading to a „System Overload“ or „Overflow“ where the cerebrum loses control and primitive reflexes (fight, flight, freeze, teasing) take over.
  • „Broad Attention“ vs. „Focused Attention“: Children with ADHS/ADS naturally possess a „broad attention,“ immediately perceiving everything in a room, including emotions. While this can be advantageous for noticing and learning new things, it becomes a „disorder“ in traditional school settings that demand focused attention.
  • Reinterpreting Behaviors: From a neurodiversity perspective, certain behaviors, like „teasing“ or „clowning“ in class, are not necessarily malicious or simply disruptive. Teasing, for example, is described as a social exploration behavior or an approach behavior, particularly used by ADHS/ADS individuals and young animals when they are unsure of a situation. Dr. Davatz suggests reinterpreting such actions, understanding them as an attempt to explore or connect rather than a deliberate act of badness.
  • „Plus“ and „Minus“ Aspects: Dr. Davatz views every predisposition as having both a „handicap“ and a „plus“. The creativity of ADHS/ADS individuals is highlighted as a positive side. Their sensitivity also brings advantages in noticing, perceiving, and learning new things. Notable figures like Elon Musk (Autist), Richard Branson (flew out of all schools), and Mozart (ADHS/ADSler) are cited as examples of highly successful neurodivergent individuals, emphasizing their giftedness rather than disability.
  • Implications for Education and Raising Children: This perspective fundamentally shifts the approach to intervention:
    • Avoiding Over-Regulation: Raising ADHS/ADS individuals „too restrictively“ or on a „short leash“ can lead to mental and somatic illnesses. Punishment does not work.
    • Coaching the Environment, Not Just the Child: Dr. Davatz strongly advocates for coaching the adults in the child’s environment (parents, teachers) on how to interact more skillfully with neurodivergent children, rather than primarily treating the child or teenager directly. The goal is to correct the environment, not the child.
    • Fostering Intrinsic Motivation and „Own Focus“: It is crucial for ADHS/ADS children to find their intrinsic motivation and their own focus. Parents should not remove activities the child enjoys (e.g., football) as punishment for school performance, as this can be demotivating.
    • Empathy and Validation: When a child with ADHS/ADS is in a „high arousal“ state (over-excited), reasoning is ineffective. Instead, allow them to cool down, then validate their emotions before discussing alternative actions. This focuses on understanding the underlying reason for their behavior.
    • Personalized Rules and Boundaries: Rules should be clearly stated upfront, communicated personally with conviction (e.g., „I want it this way in my classroom“ instead of „you must“). There should be fewer rules, and teachers should maintain a calm demeanor. Patience is key, as ADHS/ADS children often comply with a delay.
    • Rejecting Harmful Practices: Public shaming for academic struggles or disruptive behavior is strongly condemned as it damages self-esteem and personality development. Using terms like „disability“ or „handicap“ is seen as an outdated medical definition; „neurodiversity“ is the preferred and more empowering term.
    • School as a Protected Environment: The school should provide a protected environment where the child feels safe and can develop self-confidence and self-assurance, rather than being a place that immediately exposes them to the „roughness“ of the outside world. Social learning and cooperation are prioritized over mere intelligence.

In essence, the neurodiversity perspective, as articulated by Dr. Davatz, encourages a shift from viewing ADHS/ADS as a deficit to be fixed, towards understanding it as a unique way of processing the world that requires a supportive and adaptable environment for individuals to thrive and develop their inherent strengths.

https://adhs.expert/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/ADHS-Schule-fuer-Maedchen-28.5.2025.m4a.pdf

udavatz Zusammenfassung

Education of a child with ADHD/ADD

Dr. Ursula Davatz emphasizes a holistic and functional view of brain function in the context of psychiatric conditions, including ADHS/ADS, rather than seeing them as fixed diseases. She considers ADHS/ADS, Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASS), and hypersensitivity as facets of a „vulnerable, sensible neurotype“ that is more susceptible to stress and can develop various illnesses as a result. This perspective significantly shapes her approach to child education.

Here’s a comprehensive discussion on child education for children with ADHS/ADS, drawing from the provided sources:

Core Understanding of ADHS/ADS and its Educational Impact

Dr. Davatz views ADHS/ADS as a neurodiversity or an „otherness“ rather than solely a „disability“. She asserts that the brain functions holistically and is interconnected with the body, directing bodily organs. For individuals with ADHS/ADS, the emotional brain (limbic system) is stronger, more reactive, and more sensitive. It functions somewhat like fluid media, where „waves“ of excitement are larger and last longer. This means ADHS/ADS children are more sensitive to stress and require more energy for concentration. Their emotional system remains more strongly connected to the cerebrum (Grosshirn), leading them to process more impressions and become tired.

ADHS/ADS children often have a „broad attention“ where they immediately perceive everything in a room, including emotions. While this can be an advantage for noticing and learning new things, it becomes a „disorder“ in a school setting where focused attention is required.

Challenges in Traditional Education and Common Difficulties

In a traditional school environment, ADHS/ADS children often struggle because they are expected to focus narrowly, which contradicts their natural broad attention. When they are not interested, they may become disruptive, act as a „class clown,“ or disturb classmates, creating a „competition“ with the teacher.

Specific academic areas can be particularly challenging:

  • Mathematics: Requires following every step; missing one step means losing the connection, making it hard for ADHS/ADS children who may miss steps due to attention shifts.
  • Languages (e.g., French): French has many rules, which can be difficult for ADHS/ADS children who are generally worse at learning rules. Dr. Davatz suggests teaching such languages through melody and speaking to get into the „flow“.
  • Dyslexia and Dyscalculia: These learning difficulties are frequently inherited together with ADHS/ADS.

ADHS/ADS children may react to stress or difficulty by becoming aggressive outwardly (more common in boys) or by overthinking and processing internally (more common in girls). This internal processing can lead to psychosomatic illnesses, such as stomach aches in younger children who cannot articulate their feelings.

Key Educational and Therapeutic Approaches

Dr. Davatz’s philosophy for educating children with ADHS/ADS revolves around understanding their unique neurotype and adapting the environment and interactions, rather than directly treating the child for a „disease.“

  1. Avoiding Over-Regulation: Raising ADHS/ADS individuals „too restrictively“ or on a „short leash“ can lead to mental and somatic illnesses. This includes punishing them, which does not work for ADHS/ADS children.
  2. Patience and Validation in High Arousal States: When a child with ADHS/ADS is „over-excited“ (high arousal) or experiencing „System Overload/Overflow,“ reasoning with them is ineffective because the cerebrum loses control and the reptilian brain takes over. Instead, allow them to cool down („let the soup cool down“). Afterward, validate their emotions by asking what hurt or upset them before discussing alternative actions.
  3. Coaching the Environment, Not Just the Child: Dr. Davatz strongly advocates for coaching the adults in the child’s environment (parents, teachers) on how to interact more skillfully with neurodivergent children, rather than primarily treating the child or teenager directly. This is particularly crucial during the teenage years, where 50% of psychiatric illnesses begin.
  4. Promoting Intrinsic Motivation and „Own Focus“: It is crucial for ADHS/ADS children to find their intrinsic motivation and their own focus. Parents should not take away activities the child enjoys (e.g., football) as a punishment for school performance, as this can further demotivate them. Allowing children to pursue hobbies they love builds self-esteem and provides a positive outlet.
  5. Setting and Enforcing Rules:
    • Rules should be clearly stated upfront to the entire class, not only when they are broken.
    • It is better to have fewer rules (e.g., five rather than twenty).
    • Rules must be communicated personally and with clear conviction („I want it this way in my classroom“) rather than as demands („you must“). ADHS/ADS children are sensitive to direct commands.
    • Allow for some delay in compliance, as ADHS/ADS children often process and comply with a delay.
    • Teachers should maintain a calm and clear demeanor, even if internally emotional, as their state influences the child.
  6. Addressing Academic Difficulties (e.g., Math, Reading):
    • Avoid public shaming for academic struggles or disruptive behavior (like being a „clown“). This damages self-esteem and personality development.
    • Individualized support: One-on-one accompaniment, learning therapy, or working with a coach (e.g., for math) is highly beneficial, as it allows for personalized steps and prevents the child from falling behind.
    • Motivation through challenge: Encourage children by highlighting that overcoming a difficult task (like math) brings greater satisfaction and pride.
  7. Teacher’s Role and School Environment:
    • Teachers need a clear stance and know what they want. Ambivalence creates openings for ADHS/ADS children to exploit.
    • The school should be a protected environment where the child feels safe and can develop self-confidence and self-assurance. This contrasts with the „roughness“ of the outside world.
    • Prioritize the child over bureaucracy: Teachers should use their freedom and not rigidly follow regulations if it benefits the child’s development.
    • Social learning and empathy: Emphasize social behavior and respect, which is more important than intelligence for success. ADHS/ADS children are inherently empathetic and helpful.
    • Problem-solving: Involve ADHS/ADS children in problem-solving, as it taps into their intrinsic motivation and desire to help.
  8. Medication (Methylphenidate): Dr. Davatz acknowledges that Methylphenidate (Ritalin) and similar stimulants can help the brain focus more, potentially improving grades. However, she does not see it as the first solution and warns that early use might suppress creative abilities. She believes that problematic behaviors are often feedback that „something is not quite right“ and prefers to address the environment first.
  9. Addressing Absenteeism/Avoidance: For children who avoid school, it’s crucial to understand the underlying reason (e.g., academic difficulty, social issues, teacher interaction). In some cases, a „paradoxical prescription“ from systemic therapy, such as allowing the child to stay home with tasks and come to school only when intrinsically motivated, might be considered, though it needs careful consideration and communication with parents. Maintaining connection through homework and finding alternative study environments (e.g., library) is important.
  10. Working with Parents, Including Borderline Mothers: When working with parents, especially those with Borderline traits, Dr. Davatz suggests asking about their own childhood and upbringing, and their relationship with their mothers. This helps understand their deficits and provides a basis for empathetic support rather than direct criticism of their parenting, which they are highly sensitive to. The goal is to provide indirect support for the parents so they can better support their children.

Overall, the sources emphasize that effective child education for ADHS/ADS involves a patient, empathetic, and flexible approach that prioritizes the child’s well-being and intrinsic motivation, fostering a supportive environment that allows them to thrive despite their neurodivergence.

https://adhs.expert/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/ADHS-Schule-fuer-Maedchen-28.5.2025.m4a.pdf

udavatz Zusammenfassung

ADHD/ADD Brain

Dr. Ursula Davatz views psychiatric conditions not as fixed diseases like a liver cirrhosis or a heart attack, but rather as functional diagnoses of the brain. This means the brain’s functioning can change, and there isn’t a clear boundary between one „disease“ and another. She emphasizes that the brain always functions holistically and is interconnected with the body, also directing bodily organs.

Dr. Davatz utilizes Paul D. MacLean’s „Triune Brain“ model to explain brain function. This model divides the brain into three main parts:

  • The emotional brain (limbic system): Represented by the thumb in her hand model, this part is stronger, more reactive, and more sensitive in individuals with ADHS/ADS. It functions somewhat like fluid media (air and water), where movements or „waves“ of excitement can be larger and last longer.
  • The cerebrum (Grosshirn): Represented by the fingers, this is where signals from the emotional brain are ideally processed cognitively and stored as memories without emotions. In ADHS/ADS children, the emotional system remains more strongly connected to the cerebrum, meaning they have to process more impressions, which can make them tired.
  • The reptilian brain (primitive brain): Represented by the wrist, this ancient part of the brain controls vegetative nerve centers such as heart rhythm, breathing, sleep-wake cycles, and motor skills, including the cerebellum.

In individuals with ADHS/ADS, when the emotional brain (limbic system) becomes overloaded, it sends signals both up to the cerebrum and down to the reptilian brain.

  • System Overload / System Overflow: If the emotional brain is under too much stress, it can lead to „System Overload“ and subsequently „System Overflow“. When „System Overflow“ occurs, it can result in thought disturbances. Alternatively, signals can go to the reptilian brain, triggering primitive reflexes like running around, screaming, or the „fight, flight, freeze, or teasing“ responses.
  • Impact of Stress: Due to their highly excitable and reactive emotional systems, individuals with ADHS/ADS are more sensitive to stress. When stressed, their emotional brain creates a larger and longer-lasting „wave“ of excitement.

This heightened excitability means that ADHS/ADS brains require more energy for concentration compared to neurotypical brains. While the brain typically matures by age 25, in individuals with ADHS/ADS, this process may take a bit longer, allowing them to remain „childish“ and creative. However, this sensitivity also means they are more susceptible to illness if raised too restrictively. Over-regulation or attempts to educate them when they are in a state of „high arousal“ (over-excited) are ineffective because the cerebrum loses control, and the reptilian brain takes over with its reflexes. Instead, it’s crucial to allow them to calm down before engaging in rational discussion and to validate their emotions.

Dr. Davatz highlights that the reactions seen in ADHS/ADS individuals are essentially feedback that something is not quite right. This understanding of brain function is central to her approach, which focuses on coaching the environment and caregivers to interact more skillfully with neurodivergent individuals rather than primarily treating the child or teenager directly. She also emphasizes that viewing ADHS/ADS as a „neurodiversity“ or „otherness“ rather than solely a „disability“ acknowledges its potential strengths, such as creativity.

https://adhs.expert/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/ADHS-Schule-fuer-Maedchen-28.5.2025.m4a.pdf

udavatz Zusammenfassung

ADHD/ADD in Women

Dr. Ursula Davatz, who has been working with ADHS/ADS for over 40 years, discusses ADHS/ADS as a „vulnerable, sensible neurotype“ rather than a fixed disease, emphasizing that psychiatric conditions are functional diagnoses of the brain that can change. She also includes Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASS) and hypersensitivity under the umbrella of ADHS/ADS. This neurodiversity means individuals are more susceptible to stress and can develop various illnesses as a result.

Here are key aspects of ADHS/ADS in women as discussed in the sources:

Differences in Symptom Presentation and Coping Mechanisms

  • Hiding Symptoms and Adaptation: Women with ADHS/ADS tend to suffer more from the symptomatology than men. This is because women can better hide their symptoms and adapt more effectively. Girls, in particular, exert immense effort to conform, which can make their struggles unnoticeable.
  • Multitasking Ability: Women are often better at multitasking, a skill that is frequently required in daily life, such as for a housewife or in a school environment.
  • Internal Processing: While boys with ADHS/ADS often react with outward aggression when stressed, girls and women tend to react internally. They begin to overthink, process all situations very carefully, and may tell their stories meticulously, sometimes to the point of losing the listener.
  • Self-Exploitation: This constant adaptation can lead women to „exploit themselves,“ leaving them drained and with nothing left.

Diagnosis and Life Impact

  • Delayed Diagnosis: The diagnosis of ADHS/ADS in girls and women is often significantly delayed. It is frequently made only between 35 and 45 years of age, or even later, at 70 or 80 years.
  • „Aha“ Moments: Many women come to realize they have ADHS/ADS symptoms through information found in newspapers or on platforms like TikTok, leading to an „aha“ moment where they understand their own reactions and behaviors. The proportion of women being diagnosed is increasing.
  • Reduced Life Expectancy: Studies from England and America indicate that women with ADHS/ADS die ten years earlier than average, whereas men with ADHS/ADS die seven years earlier. This shorter lifespan in women might be linked to them never finding their own „focus“ or being helped to find it.
  • Comorbidity: A significant majority (80%) of individuals diagnosed with ADHS/ADS in adulthood have one or more additional psychiatric diagnoses, which Dr. Davatz considers follow-up illnesses.

Psychiatric and Somatic Consequences

  • Depression: Women with ADHS/ADS are more prone to depression, experiencing twice as many depressions in old age as men.
  • Psychosomatic Illnesses: Women tend to develop psychosomatic illnesses, frequently involving the musculoskeletal system. These can include back pain, generalized tension, joint pain, headaches, exhaustion, and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Dr. Davatz noted many women with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome after COVID.
  • Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD): Women are more likely to develop Borderline Personality Disorder, which Dr. Davatz describes as a result of ADHS/ADS individuals being raised too restrictively and always adapting. When they reach puberty and hormonal surges, they „break all boundaries“ and become „wild“. If their environment cannot cope with them, they feel abandoned and may engage in attention-seeking behaviors, effectively becoming „professionally pubertating“. They seek guidance and accompaniment.

Brain Function and Sensitivity

  • Emotional Brain: Individuals with ADHS/ADS have a stronger, more reactive, and more sensitive emotional brain (limbic system). This emotional brain, likened to fluid media like air and water, experiences greater and longer-lasting „waves“ of excitement.
  • System Overload/Overflow: When the emotional brain is overloaded, it sends signals that can lead to a „System Overload“ and then „System Overflow“. This can result in thought disturbances, or signals going to the primitive (reptilian) brain, causing primitive reflexes like running around or screaming.
  • Connection with Grosshirn: The emotional system in ADHS/ADS children remains more strongly connected to the cerebrum (Grosshirn), meaning they have to process more impressions, which makes them tired.
  • Stress Susceptibility: Due to their highly excitable and reactive emotional systems, individuals with ADHS/ADS are more sensitive to stress.

Educational and Therapeutic Approaches

  • Avoiding Over-Regulation: Raising ADHS/ADS individuals too restrictively or on a „short leash“ can lead to mental and somatic illnesses.
  • Patience and Validation: When ADHS/ADS individuals are in a „high arousal“ (over-excited) state, it is ineffective to try to educate them with reason. Instead, allow them to cool down, then validate their emotions by asking what hurt them or upset them before discussing alternative actions. This allows them to process the experience and integrate it.
  • Coaching the Environment: Dr. Davatz advocates for coaching the adults and the environment (parents, teachers) rather than directly treating the child or teenager with ADHS/ADS. This approach focuses on teaching caregivers how to interact more skillfully with neurodivergent individuals.
  • Understanding Borderline Mothers: When working with Borderline mothers, Dr. Davatz suggests asking about their own childhood and upbringing, and their relationship with their own mothers. This helps understand their deficits and allows for a more supportive approach, rather than direct criticism of their parenting, which they are very sensitive to.
  • Intrinsic Motivation: It is crucial for ADHS/ADS individuals to find their intrinsic motivation and their own focus. Parents should not take away activities children enjoy (e.g., football for a child struggling in school), as this can demotivate them further in other areas. Allowing children to pursue hobbies they love builds self-esteem.
  • Neurodiversity Perspective: It is beneficial to view ADHS/ADS as a neurodiversity, an „otherness,“ rather than solely a „disability“. This perspective acknowledges the strengths, such as creativity, that come with this neurotype. Prominent figures like Elon Musk (Autist) and Richard Branson (likely ADHS/ADS) exemplify how neurodivergence can be associated with significant achievements.

https://adhs.expert/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/ADHS-Schule-fuer-Maedchen-28.5.2025.m4a.pdf